Specifications that restrict competition to fewer than three manufacturers or producers may be used only for what reason?

Specifications that restrict competition to fewer than three manufacturers or producers may be justified only for sound reasons in the public interest. This principle ensures that any limitations placed on competition are not arbitrary but are instead grounded in objectives that serve the greater good, such as ensuring public safety, health, or welfare.

For instance, there may be cases where only a specific manufacturer's product meets necessary safety standards, or certain specialized equipment is essential for a project due to unique project requirements. By adhering to this guideline, public agencies ensure that they remain compliant with fair competition laws while still fulfilling their obligation to protect the interests of the community.

While cost-effectiveness, simplifying the procurement process, or maintaining exclusive vendor relationships could be seen as beneficial in certain contexts, they do not provide sufficient justification for limiting competition. The emphasis is always on the public interest to ensure that the procurement process remains ethical, transparent, and justifiable.