The contractor is entitled to additional time but not additional money in which type of delay?

In the context of construction contracts, an excusable delay refers to an event that is beyond the control of the contractor, which impacts the schedule of the project. These delays typically include unforeseen circumstances like severe weather, changes in regulatory requirements, or other factors that are not attributable to the contractor's actions.

In such cases, the contractor is granted additional time to complete the project but does not receive additional compensation for any associated costs incurred due to the delay. This is because the nature of the excusable delay does not place the risk of loss on the contractor; it acknowledges that the contractor is entitled to an extension of time to fulfill the contract obligations without the right to extra money, as the costs were not a direct result of their performance.

In contrast, compensable delays would allow the contractor both time and money, as these delays are typically caused by the actions or inactions of the owner. Nonexcusable delays refer to situations where the contractor is at fault, leading to both time loss and potential financial penalties. Concurrent delays involve overlapping delays that may complicate the determination of responsibility, but do not fit the scenario where only additional time is warranted. Thus, the distinction is clear: excusable delays entitle the contractor to time extensions without financial compensation